PHYSICAL AI COMPANY PROFILE

MORAI jobs, roles and career guide

See which roles MORAI is hiring for now and what experience and candidate conditions appear in its current postings.

Seoul · GarchingAutonomy simulation platformOfficial site ↗

CANDIDATE QUICK CHECK

30-second check before you apply

Check location, experience, education, work authorization, work mode and pay before opening individual jobs.

Official postings
Current hiring data refreshes from official sources in the browser.

BANSEOG OUTLOOK

MORAI sells the same test track to rivals and to the agencies that judge them

MORAI's founders studied autonomous driving in graduate school at KAIST and first meant to build a car themselves, but the hardware burden led them in 2018 to a simulator, a testing tool, instead. Within three years they had investment from the Hyundai, Naver and Kakao Ventures sides at once, and by 2022 their customer list set Hyundai Mobis, NAVER LABS and 42dot beside the Korea Automobile Testing and Research Institute. In 2023 MORAI joined that institute's project as a co-research partner on a virtual test platform supporting Level 4 validation, evaluation and certification, and the head of its German subsidiary, set up in 2024, took on alliances with companies, research institutes and regulators. The same platform is now described as serving defense and dual-use fields too. Banseog reads the company's habit as keeping a test ground used by both players and referees, without standing on any one player's side. That is why Banseog sees protecting each customer's secrets while earning the referees' trust in test results as the next talent challenge.

Banseog analysis
The next company challengeStrictly separate the data and scenarios of competing customers while building evidence that evaluation agencies can accept that virtual test results hold on real roads and in real skies, and keep those standards of trust consistent from cars through to defense.
Questions before joining
  1. By what metric, and by whom, is a virtual test judged to match reality?
  2. How are competing customers' data and scenarios kept separate between projects?
  3. How is this role's time split between product development and customer-specific work?
Evaluation systems take shapeA virtual test a referee can trust

The company has worked with a public research institute on technology that supports evaluation and certification. If moves to use virtual test results as a basis for official judgment continue, proving how closely they match real tests may become important.

Growing in EuropeOne test ground under different rules

The company has a German subsidiary covering the EMEA market. Keeping one product while fitting different regional standards and alliances may grow as work.

The weight of defenseQuality in tests that cannot be published

The company says its platform serves defense and dual-use fields. As customers who cannot share data outside grow, standards that hold the same quality in secure environments may become important. These are conditional stages, not confirmed dates or hiring plans.

Capabilities gaining importance
Proving simulation credibilityDesigning separation of customer dataTurning real driving records into scenariosUnderstanding evaluation and certification proceduresHandling standards and security by field
Talent markets to explore
Autonomous driving simulation and real-time 3DAutomotive functional safety and validationDigital twins and HD mapsDefense unmanned systems and softwareTechnical sales and customer engineering

Current hiring comes from the existing verified data pipeline. This is a conditional talent and organization outlook, not a company hiring plan, personal-fit assessment or hiring-probability forecast. · 2026-11-01

FUTURE TALENT SHIFT

How responsibilities may expand

Follow the responsibility that runs from one virtual test result to evidence that customers and evaluation agencies both trust. Check individual postings for actual duties and qualifications.

Banseog analysis
Simulator core development
Improving visual and physics realism→Presenting the gap with real results as a measurable metric
Sensor modeling
Implementing camera and lidar behavior→Also stating the conditions under which the model can be trusted
Scenario engineering
Building scenarios to customer requests→Building real driving records into test items usable in evaluation
Project management
Managing delivery schedules by customer→Also managing data boundaries between competing customers
Technical sales
Demonstrating products and explaining features→Explaining test credibility in the language of institutes and regulators
Quality and standards
Managing software quality→Organizing tool evidence against standards customers follow, such as functional safety

CAREER LENS

Experience getting other people to trust your test results

Beyond building test environments, look for times you explained to outsiders why the results matched reality. Adjacent experience suggests connections, not eligibility or a personal-fit verdict.

Experience to show in your career history

✓

Measuring and reducing the gap between simulation and real tests

✓

Turning real driving records into test scenarios

✓

Explaining test evidence in a certification or external review

✓

Keeping data boundaries across several customers' projects

✓

Building precise environments with real-time 3D tools or physics models

✓

Running large parallel tests in the cloud

Where adjacent experience can lead

Game and real-time graphics development

Building real-time environments with tools such as Unreal can connect to simulator development.

Automotive validation and testing

Real vehicle test procedures and pass criteria are the connection.

Aerospace and defense modeling and simulation

Virtual testing of aircraft or defense systems can connect to new fields.

Surveying and HD mapping

Experience moving real spaces accurately into data.

Enterprise software technical support

Fitting and explaining a product in customer environments.

Research institutes and standards work

Work on test methods or evaluation criteria can connect to collaborating with evaluation agencies.

Questions before joining

  1. By what metric, and by whom, is a virtual test judged to match reality?
  2. How are competing customers' data and scenarios kept separate between projects?
  3. How is this role's time split between product development and customer-specific work?
  4. How do criteria from public evaluation projects reach the general product?
  5. How do security conditions and ways of working change on defense customer work?

PLACE × TALENT INTELLIGENCE

Work connected across locations

These interpretations use publicly reported locations and joint research activities. They do not describe regional hiring plans or current staffing.

Banseog analysis
SeoulCenter of product development

The company has developed its simulation platform from Seoul. This reads as where customer needs gather into one product, with no estimate of current team structure or size.

Simulator developmentDigital twinsScenario building
Garching, GermanyLink to European markets and institutions

The German subsidiary, active since 2024, is in Garching near Munich. This reads as the point of contact with European rules; check postings for actual placement.

Customer engineeringInstitutional alliancesDefense response
M-City, Michigan, USAOverseas joint research

In November 2023 the company signed an agreement with M-City and said it would join three-way research with the Korea Automobile Testing and Research Institute. This reads as where evidence comparing virtual and real may build up, without presuming results.

Scenario researchInternational joint researchTest comparison
Korean public evaluation projectsLearning the referee's language

The company is a co-research partner in a Level 4 virtual test environment project led by the institute. This reads as the point where evaluation criteria reach the product, without presuming adoption in official certification.

Evaluation and certification technologyParallel testingReporting systems
Real driving records → virtual test ground → customer development and validation → evidence for evaluation agencies → the next test standard

WATCH NEXT

How to test this outlook

If the company moves close to being a dedicated developer for one customer, or its work with evaluation agencies shrinks, revise this reading to prioritize large-customer business over the habit of a neutral test ground.

Banseog analysis
01How do evaluation agencies reflect virtual test results in official procedures?
02Do competing customers continue to be named together?
03In what tests do public defense cases appear?
04Do validation or certification roles appear in job postings?
05Do the German subsidiary's alliances grow first with companies or with institutions?
Job seekers

Find the roles your experience can reach

Paste your career and see which open Physical AI roles it connects to.

Analyze my career
Hiring teams

Hard-to-find Physical AI talent?

Tell us the role and location, and we propose how to secure the people, with market data.

Talent consultation
Leadership

Weighing an overseas site or the business direction too?

The next site, the next business and the organisation it needs, worked through with leadership.

Strategy advisory